Many finance teams think they have a reporting problem. In reality, they often have a consolidation problem. Let’s say your company operates four entities. One runs SAP, another uses Oracle Fusion, a third keeps its books in Business Central, and the newest acquisition reports out of Xero. At month-end, management wants a single set of numbers. Unfortunately, there is no common chart of accounts. Revenue is classified one way in one entity and another way somewhere else, while expenses that belong together sit in different accounts. As a result, someone exports everything into Excel and maps each account to a common chart of accounts before the figures can be consolidated. For a while, the process may appear to work perfectly well. But if even a single account is mapped incorrectly, the consolidated numbers no longer tie. Finance cannot finalize the reporting package or update the forecast because nobody is certain which figures can be trusted, and the variance analysis must wait while hours are spent tracing the source of the discrepancy. Most organizations respond by trying to improve the reporting itself. They redesign dashboards, build new reports, or look for ways to shorten the close. Yet none of these efforts addresses the real constraint. Reporting is the final stage of the process; consolidation comes before it. Until the entities roll up into one reliable set of numbers, everything downstream must wait. The finance teams that understand this stop focusing on the activities that follow consolidation and concentrate on consolidation itself. Once the roll-up process becomes reliable, reports arrive faster, forecasts arrive faster, and finance can spend less time reconciling figures and more time analyzing them. Like many business problems, the symptom is often mistaken for the cause. The report may be late, but the delay usually began much earlier. The next time a report arrives late, ask yourself: was the problem really the report? Have you seen the same pattern in multi-entity organizations?
Is Your Reporting Problem Really a Consolidation Problem
More Relevant Posts
-
📌 Record to Report (RTR) in SAP – End-to-End Process Record to Report (RTR) is the backbone of financial reporting. It transforms daily financial transactions into accurate financial statements that help management make informed business decisions. Here's the complete Record to Report (RTR) process in SAP: 1️⃣ Transaction Recording - Financial transactions from AP, AR, Payroll, Fixed Assets, Inventory, and Banking are recorded in SAP. - Every transaction is posted to the appropriate General Ledger (G/L) account. 2️⃣ Journal Entry Posting (F-02 / FB50) - Finance teams post manual journal entries for adjustments, corrections, accruals, and reclassifications. - Each journal entry follows company accounting policies and approval workflows. 3️⃣ Bank Reconciliation (FF_5 / FEBAN) - Bank statements are imported into SAP. - Transactions are matched with SAP records. - Any differences are identified and resolved to ensure accurate cash balances. 4️⃣ General Ledger (G/L) Reconciliation (FBL3N) - G/L accounts are reviewed and reconciled. - Finance teams verify balances and investigate discrepancies before month-end close. 5️⃣ Intercompany Reconciliation - Transactions between different company codes are reconciled. - Differences are resolved to ensure accurate group financial reporting. 6️⃣ Accruals & Provisions - Expenses incurred but not yet paid are recorded as accruals. - Provisions are created for future obligations in accordance with accounting standards. 7️⃣ Fixed Asset Accounting (AS01 / ABZON / AFAB) - Asset acquisitions, depreciation, transfers, and retirements are recorded. - SAP calculates and posts depreciation automatically. 8️⃣ Period-End Closing (F.13 / FAGLGVTR) - Month-end and year-end closing activities are performed. - Open items are cleared, balances are carried forward, and all accounts are reviewed before closing the period. 9️⃣ Financial Statement Preparation - SAP generates the Trial Balance, Profit & Loss Statement, and Balance Sheet. - Finance teams review reports to ensure completeness and accuracy. 🔟 Financial Reporting & Analysis - Final reports are shared with management and stakeholders. - The reports support budgeting, forecasting, compliance, audits, and strategic decision-making. 💡 Key Takeaways ✔ Accurate Transaction Recording = Reliable Financial Data ✔ Timely Reconciliations = Fewer Errors ✔ Proper Journal Entries = Accurate Financial Statements ✔ Successful Month-End Close = Better Business Decisions ✔ Record to Report is not just about preparing reports—it's about ensuring financial accuracy, compliance, transparency, and delivering meaningful insights for the business. 📖 Understanding the RTR process has helped me appreciate how every financial transaction ultimately contributes to the organization's financial statements and strategic decision-making. #SAP #RTR #RecordToReport #Finance #Accounting #SAPFICO #GeneralLedger #MonthEndClose #FinancialReporting #GLAccounting #CareerGrowth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲… 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆. 🚨 The reason is often ignored — 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘀. Many businesses invest in accounting software like 𝗤𝘂𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀 𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 (𝗤𝗕𝗢), 𝗫𝗲𝗿𝗼, and other ERP/accounting systems, but still struggle to get meaningful reports. Why? Because your 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘀 is the foundation of your entire financial reporting system. 𝗔 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗸 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺𝘀: ❌ Confusing profit numbers ❌ Incorrect expense classification ❌ Poor cash flow visibility ❌ Difficult month-end closing ❌ Reports that do not support decision-making As your business grows, your 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 must grow with it. A chart designed for a small business may not work when you have: • Multiple revenue streams • New products/services • Growing teams • Higher transaction volumes • Complex financial reporting needs 𝗔 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹-𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱: 📊 Where your money is going 📊 Which areas are profitable 📊 Your actual cash position 📊 Business performance trends 📊 Future growth opportunities Your accounting records should not just be maintained for compliance. They should become a tool for better business decisions. 𝗔𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 (𝗧𝗟𝗣), 𝘄𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵: ✔ Accounting & Bookkeeping ✔ QuickBooks Online (QBO) & Xero Support ✔ Financial Reporting & MIS ✔ GST & Tax Compliance ✔ Cash Flow Management ✔ Virtual CFO Services ✔ Business Finance Advisory Because accurate books are not just about numbers… They are about creating 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 for business growth. 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 (𝗧𝗟𝗣) 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺, 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁. consult@trueledgerpartners, +91-7736743674 #TrueLedgerPartners #TLP #AccountingServices #Bookkeeping #QuickBooksOnline #QBO #Xero #AccountingOutsourcing #VirtualCFO #FinancialReporting #CashFlowManagement #GST #TaxCompliance #BusinessFinance #SMEIndia #StartupIndia #FinancePartner #BusinessGrowth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A £120,000 finance system running like a £12,000 one is the most expensive mistake I see in mid-market finance. It happens more often than anyone admits, and the cause is always the same decision made in the first week. Sage Intacct sits in a different category from Sage 50. Sage 50 records what happened. Intacct runs how the business operates: dimensions, automated allocations, continuous consolidation, rules-based intercompany elimination. The two tools answer different questions. One tells you the balance. The other tells you why the balance moved and where. The businesses that struggle buy Intacct and rebuild Sage 50 inside it. Same chart of accounts. Same manual journals. Same month-end spreadsheet that someone exports, adjusts, and imports back. They pay six figures for a platform and then configure it to behave like the thing they just left. Their close stays at 12 days. The board still waits until day 14 for numbers. The finance team still spends the first week of every month gathering data instead of reading it. The licence cost went up by a factor of ten and the output did not move. The businesses that get a 3-day close within a quarter do one thing differently. They treat the move as an operational redesign before they touch the software. That means mapping the close cycle first. Finding If you are moving to Sage Intacct this year and want to know which parts of your close cycle have the most compression potential, reply with SPRINT and I will send you the 90-minute diagnostic.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📘 End-to-End Accounting Cycle | Every Finance Professional Should Know The Accounting Cycle is a systematic process used to record, classify, summarize, and report financial transactions. It ensures financial statements are accurate, complete, and compliant with accounting standards. 🔹 Step 1: Identify Financial Transactions Record all business transactions such as sales, purchases, receipts, payments, salaries, expenses, and asset acquisitions. 🔹 Step 2: Analyze Transactions Determine the accounts affected and apply the accounting equation: Assets = Liabilities + Equity Identify whether each account should be debited or credited. 🔹 Step 3: Record Journal Entries Post transactions in the General Journal using the double-entry accounting system. Every transaction must have equal debits and credits. 🔹 Step 4: Post to the General Ledger Transfer journal entries into individual ledger accounts to maintain account-wise balances. 🔹 Step 5: Prepare the Trial Balance Compile all ledger balances to verify that: Total Debits = Total Credits This helps identify posting errors before financial reporting. 🔹 Step 6: Pass Adjusting Entries Record adjustments at the end of the accounting period for: - Accruals - Prepayments - Depreciation - Amortization - Provisions - Inventory adjustments 🔹 Step 7: Prepare the Adjusted Trial Balance Update account balances after adjustments to ensure accurate financial reporting. 🔹 Step 8: Prepare Financial Statements Generate: 📊 Income Statement (Profit & Loss) 📋 Balance Sheet 💰 Cash Flow Statement 📑 Statement of Changes in Equity 🔹 Step 9: Pass Closing Entries Close temporary accounts such as revenues, expenses, and drawings to retained earnings and reset them for the next accounting period. 🔹 Step 10: Prepare the Post-Closing Trial Balance Verify that only permanent accounts remain open and ensure the books are ready for the next accounting cycle. 📈 Key Benefits ✅ Accurate Financial Reporting ✅ Better Internal Controls ✅ Regulatory Compliance ✅ Improved Decision-Making ✅ Easier Audits ✅ Error Detection & Correction ✅ Reliable Financial Statements 💡 Essential Skills for Accountants ✔ Journal Entries ✔ General Ledger (GL) ✔ Bank Reconciliation ✔ Accounts Payable (AP) ✔ Accounts Receivable (AR) ✔ Month-End Close ✔ SAP FICO / Oracle ERP ✔ Advanced Excel ✔ Financial Reporting Remember: A strong understanding of the Accounting Cycle is the foundation of every finance role—from Accounts Payable and General Ledger to R2R, FP&A, Audit, and Financial Analysis. #Accounting #AccountingCycle #Finance #GeneralLedger #R2R #AccountsPayable #AccountsReceivable #FinancialReporting #MonthEndClose #SAPFICO #AdvancedExcel #FinanceCareer #CMA #MCom #LinkedInLearning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Rebate Accounting in R2R Rebate accounting is the process of recording and managing discounts or incentives that are agreed upon between a company and its customers or suppliers. In the R2R process, rebates must be accurately accrued, reconciled, and reported to ensure financial statements are correct. R2R Activities for Rebate Accounting Record rebate accruals at month-end based on agreements. Post journal entries for rebate expense or rebate liability. Reconcile rebate balances with customer/supplier statements. Review and adjust accruals based on actual claims. Clear the liability when the rebate is paid or credited. Report rebate balances in the financial statements. Example Journal Entries 1. Create Rebate Accrual Dr. Rebate Expense ₹10,000 Cr. Rebate Payable ₹10,000 2. Pay or Credit the Rebate Dr. Rebate Payable ₹10,000 Cr. Bank / Accounts Receivable ₹10,000 SAP Transactions (Example) General Ledger (GL) Posting Accrual Journal Entry Balance Sheet Reconciliation Month-End Closing Financial Reporting R2R Activities for Rebate Accounting Record rebate accruals at month-end based on agreements. Post journal entries for rebate expense or rebate liability. Reconcile rebate balances with customer/supplier statements. Review and adjust accruals based on actual claims. Clear the liability when the rebate is paid or credited. Report rebate balances in the financial statements. Example Journal Entries 1. Create Rebate Accrual Dr. Rebate Expense ₹10,000 Cr. Rebate Payable ₹10,000 2. Pay or Credit the Rebate Dr. Rebate Payable ₹10,000 Cr. Bank / Accounts Receivable ₹10,000 SAP Transactions (Example) General Ledger (GL) Posting Accrual Journal Entry Balance Sheet Reconciliation Month-End Closing Financial Reporting These activities are typically performed during the month-end close as part of the R2R cycle
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Three patterns are emerging for AI workflows. First, people want to use AI and agentic workflows as personal tools, the same way they use spreadsheets. Anthropic's CFO builds workflows to get answers and reports. The demand isn't for pre-baked AI solutions for a never changing process. The demand is for a tool set for automating something that might only be run twice before it needs to be adjusted again. Second, the legacy systems of record are not going anywhere. NetSuite, core banking systems, core trading systems, SAP, they are being kept as trusted sources of truth. They have access control, transactional integrity, back-up, security, and all the things needed to keep a real world process running. Third, the new class of software replacing some SaaS and some "manual processes" will be either domain specific harness run-times like Tabs (especially if they add more support for user customized workflows) or generalized ones.
Anthropic's CFO is running finance operations on NetSuite. I see the same dichotomy at Tabs in our users. Our most sophisticated customers' top two line items right now are NetSuite and Claude. I’ve never seen a stronger correlation between two vendors in NetSuite + Anthropic's Claude. And it goes against the AI replacing legacy software narrative that the most AI-forward finance teams are the most committed to their ERP. Which I thought sounded contradictory until I looked deeper at what finance teams are actually doing. They're aggressively using MCP with Claude, but primarily for reporting, not true workflows. They're synthesizing data, surfacing patterns, and answering questions about numbers that already exist. Claude is the right tool for those use cases because reporting is a read-only problem. What Claude isn't doing is running transactional workflows (where Tabs comes in) like billing, payments, collections, revenue recognition, or month-end close. These require deterministic execution, audit trails, controls, and deep integration with the ERP. The system has to understand context before automations run and produce results that are defensible at close. Speed and accuracy have to coexist. Producing an answer and executing a fully auditable workflow are fundamentally different jobs. That's why NetSuite isn't shrinking in our customers' finance stacks. It's actually getting reinforced as the operational backbone while Claude handles the intelligence layer on top. And then there's the other side of the ledger, which I think is even more interesting. Look at where budgets are shifting to: point solutions, standalone reporting tools, and FP&A platforms which are all being asked to do more to justify their line item. Claude is absorbing a meaningful portion of the reporting job, and the tools that used to own that job exclusively are feeling that pressure. Once you see that, the NetSuite + Claude correlation makes complete sense. The finance stack is restructuring around two layers. The operational infrastructure that does the work on technologies like Tabs (our MCP demo below), and AI that reports it.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Six calls on where finance technology lands by end of 2028. Three that will look obvious in hindsight. Three that will not age well. Written for the CFOs and CIOs who are funding these bets in the 2027 budget cycle right now. Will look obvious in hindsight. 1. Agentic AI running the close. Autonomous agents doing reconciliations, journal entries, and variance analysis. Not the assisted-AI tools that need a human to trigger every action. Real agents. Humans stay in the loop for judgment and exceptions, but the mechanical work runs itself. Finance functions still using assisted tools in 2028 will look like the ones still running manual reconciliations in 2020. 2. AI embedded natively inside the ERP and EPM core. Oracle, SAP, Workday, NetSuite, and OneStream will absorb the AI layer. Third-party bolt-ons will lose the argument for anything but edge cases. The caveat is adaptability. Native AI wins if the vendors ship flexible, configurable capability. If they ship rigid models, the bolt-on market survives longer than it should. 3. The finance data platform as a discrete architectural layer, owned by finance. Not inside the ERP. Not owned by IT. A layer that sits between source systems and the analytics stack, controlled by the CFO's organization. The reason finance wins the ownership question is not political. It is that finance understands its own data better than any other function ever will. Will not age well. 4. AI Centers of Excellence built as innovation labs. Most of them get quietly shut down inside 24 months. Not because AI failed. Because the CoE was structured without P&L accountability. Innovation labs without a savings number attached lose funding in the first budget squeeze. The AI programs that survive get restructured as operating functions owned by finance leaders with real numbers on their heads. 5. The consultant-led digital transformation program. The Big Four systems integration model does not survive the next cycle at its current scale. In-house transformation leadership displaces it. Not because consultants are wrong, but because the work has become too continuous to hand off. Companies that keep outsourcing the transformation lead will fall behind the ones that build it in-house. 6. The buy-versus-build framing. Buy versus build is the wrong question for 2028. The right question is compose versus inherit. Platforms are becoming configurable enough that the real choice is which capabilities to compose from vendor components and which to inherit from the platform's defaults. Companies still running buy-versus-build committees will spend two years arguing about decisions the market has already made. The pattern underneath all six. The technology is not the story. The organizational structures around the technology are the story. The winners in 2028 will not be the companies that adopted the fastest. They will be the ones that made the structural bets right.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stage 1 is not only about “closing the books accurately.” It is about closing them accurately, efficiently, and on time. But no finance function can consistently close in fewer than six business days while manually consolidating and reconciling data across disparate systems—unless it has an army in the back office. The real purpose of Stage 1 is to build the foundation: accurate books, reliable controls, and a single version of truth. Without it, forecasting, scenario planning, AI, and strategic finance are built on unstable ground. Too often, CFOs treat this work as housekeeping and move on. That is the mistake. Because Stage 1 is not an accounting exercise. It is an infrastructure build. It requires finance to establish: • A chart of accounts that does not try to carry every management-reporting question • ERP dimensions that can analyze results by product, customer, geography, department, project, or cost center • Clear ownership and controls over manual journal entries • Reconciled source data across CRM, HRIS/HCM, AP, AR, spend, payments/banking, project, and operational systems • One set of definitions for revenue, margin, headcount, utilization, backlog, and cash • A close process designed for both accuracy and speed The reason it's hard is that the truth lives in pieces. Revenue sits in billing and the CRM. People costs sit in HR and payroll. Spend sits in AP and procurement. The GL only sees the journal entries. Stitch them together by hand and the numbers don't tie, the close drags, and three to five "versions" of the same figure start to circulate. Then the close takes ten, twelve, or fifteen days—and management still does not fully trust the numbers. At that point, the problem is no longer the close. It is the operating architecture underneath it. The test is brutally simple. After your next close, ask: how long to tell me gross margin by product line and geography, versus the same period last year? Under two days with no manual reconciliation — Stage 1 is solid. A week of Excel — it isn't. Different people give different numbers — fix that before anything else. The map below shows where Stage 1 sits in the climb. The five-dimension diagnostic is in the first comment. For CFOs, CEOs, CXOs, and PE operators — where is your Stage 1 weakest: disconnected systems, manual data entry, the chart of accounts and dimensions, or a slow, un-owned close? The CFO who treats Stage 1 as bookkeeping stays a scorekeeper. The one who treats it as infrastructure earns the right to everything above it. #CFO #PrivateEquity #FinanceTransformation #StrategicFinance #FPandA
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
📊 Understanding the Complete Accounting Cycle: From Transaction to Financial Statements Every financial report begins with a single business transaction. Whether it’s a customer invoice, vendor payment, bank transaction, or asset purchase, every transaction follows a structured accounting cycle that ensures accuracy, compliance, and reliable financial reporting. 📌 The Accounting Cycle in Simple Steps 1️⃣ Business Transaction Occurs Examples: * Customer Invoice * Vendor Invoice * Purchase Order (PO) * Bank Statement * Receipt ⬇️ 2️⃣ Journal Entry (JE) Every transaction is recorded using the double-entry accounting principle, where total debits always equal total credits. ⬇️ 3️⃣ Sub-Ledgers Transactions are first recorded in specialized ledgers such as: * Accounts Receivable (AR) * Accounts Payable (AP) * Inventory * Fixed Assets ⬇️ 4️⃣ General Ledger (GL) The General Ledger consolidates all financial transactions and serves as the primary source for financial reporting. ⬇️ 5️⃣ Unadjusted Trial Balance Prepared to verify that total debits equal total credits before period-end adjustments. ⬇️ 6️⃣ Period-End Adjustments Typical adjustments include: ✔️ Accruals ✔️ Deferrals ✔️ Depreciation ✔️ Amortization ✔️ Prepayments ✔️ Provisions ✔️ Reclassifications ⬇️ 7️⃣ Adjusted Trial Balance Ensures all adjustments have been recorded correctly before preparing financial statements. ⬇️ 8️⃣ Account Reconciliations Organizations reconcile: * Bank Accounts * General Ledger * Accounts Receivable * Accounts Payable * Intercompany Balances This step helps identify discrepancies and ensures financial accuracy. ⬇️ 9️⃣ Financial Statements Using the adjusted trial balance, organizations prepare: 📈 Income Statement (Profit & Loss) 📊 Balance Sheet 💵 Statement of Cash Flows 📋 Statement of Changes in Equity 📝 Notes to Financial Statements ⬇️ 🔟 Management Review, Audit & Closing After review and audit: * Closing Entries are posted. * A Post-Closing Trial Balance is prepared. * The next accounting period begins. 💡 Key Takeaway The accounting cycle is much more than recording journal entries. It’s a structured process that transforms daily business transactions into reliable financial statements for management, investors, auditors, and regulators. Whether you’re preparing for an accounting interview, learning SAP FICO, or building your finance career, mastering this cycle is essential. 💬 Which step do you think is the most critical in ensuring accurate financial reporting? Share your thoughts in the comments! 👇 💾 Save this post for quick revision. ♻️ Repost to help students and finance professionals strengthen their accounting fundamentals. Follow Amit Singh for practical insights on Accounting, SAP FICO, SAP S/4HANA, ERP, and Finance Careers. Image Credit- Shreya D. #Accounting #GeneralLedger #AmitSingh #JournalEntries #TrialBalance #FinancialStatements #AccountsPayable #AccountsReceivable #CareerGrowth #Learning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I've helped over 9+ companies fix their finance operations. And most of them face the SAME problem: They focus on the top layers of financial reporting before building the foundations. They obsess over shiny BI dashboards, board slide decks, and profit metrics... but skip the data structure that makes cashflow predictable long-term. Your board might love the look of the slides, but your bank account will still run dry. And that core problem splits into 4 sub-problems: Sub-Problem (1): They spend hours tweaking forecast charts instead of structuring their messy source data (like billing schedules, contracts in emails, and messy Excel sheets). Sub-Problem (2): They run payroll and pay bills daily but don’t follow consistent accounts payable or receivable workflows. Sub-Problem (3): They copy billing setups from other companies but don’t have a proper, auditable revenue recognition and credit control plan. Sub-Problem (4): They start from scratch every month-end, manually chasing late payments without a repeatable collections strategy. They’re trying to “fix” reporting aesthetics while the real problem is deeper; their financial data lacks structure. If you want to build a real finance operations system, work on these 7 steps: Data Ingestion: Know exactly where your financial data lives (emails, contracts, billing schedules). Standardization: Map your workflows into your accounting tools (QuickBooks, Xero, Sage) to eliminate spreadsheet risk. Built-in Controls: Focus on 3-5 operational workflows that ensure proper data security and governance. Collections Cadence: Organize payment terms and follow-ups to maintain healthy accounts receivable. Supplier Management: Handle accounts payable seamlessly to control working capital and cash decisions. Reconciliation: Ensure every transaction is matched with bank-level, UK GAAP / IFRS accuracy. Reporting: Generate cashflow forecasts and board-ready outputs that actually reflect reality. Bonus step: Create a standardised month-end close checklist. Which step do you find the most difficult?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I've seen organizations blame the dashboard when the real problem was five different definitions of revenue sitting underneath it. Consolidation and governance rarely get enough attention.