Dustin Collins’ Post

I typed my own company into an AI tool last week. It told me we can't do something we've done for years. Confident. Specific. Dead wrong. So I checked its sources. Where was it getting this? Turns out the content traced back to comparison pages and "best tools" lists 99% of which were written by competitive solutions. Unsurprisingly: they'd described our capabilities wrong. Things we do every day, listed as things we can't do. Here's the game. There’s a whole genre of content that exists purely to feed search systems (Google, AI, etc) : "Top 10 tools," "alternatives to X," head-to-head comparison pages. These aren’t really to inform a buyer. They want to get picked up by an AI system or search engine. I’m not hating the player, but this is the game. I'm the VP of Sales at VT, I know the product well, so it was easy for me to catch it. Buyers researching a tool they've never touched won't have a clue. What’s the point? Before you trust AI on any tool, check who wrote the page it's sourcing. If it's on a competitor's site, it's a sales pitch in a lab coat. Try it on a product you know super well this week. I'd bet you find at least one flat error. Then go see the source. It’ll all make sense. Full disclosure: I sell one of these tools, so weigh what I say accordingly. That's my whole point, everyone here has a side. #GovCon #AI

Fully agree. Vendors all over the place playing the "Dark Arts" to game the AI. Lob-sided "X vs. Y" Competitor pages all over the place. And: - most of the X is over inflated or a stretch - Most of the Y is mislesding at best and dowright wrong at worst. Similar to what vendors do with pay to play analyst reports. At VisibleThread, we don't play these games. Judge us by trialing our software. Buyer beware!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories